hit counter

home | life | tech | ritz | sports | vent | toon | events
Values and Justice are the Pillars of Society

Omar Hossino Staff Writer
Published 04-28-06
Graphic By: Jen Hight
Moral values, respectful behavior, righteous conduct and justice are the foundational pillars on which civilization and society stand. They function to solidify the unity found in society, prevent unnecessary tension and promote group feeling. Societies and civilizations rise through their holding fast to such axial foundations, and they fall through the obstinate rejection of them. The decadence of moral values, respectful character and good character are reasons for the perishing of the principles that society stands on. The decadence of justice is cause for the absence of peace, harmony, and human rights within society itself. Pope John Paul II is quite often quoted as saying "if you want peace, then work for justice."

The great Muslim scholar Ibn Khaldun, who is considered by many to be the father of sociology, wrote of the origins of societal decay in his monumental work al-Muqaddimah, stating quite clearly:

"Injustice ruins civilization. The ruin (of civilization) has as its consequence the complete destruction of the dynasty… Since, as we have seen, injustice calls for the eradication of the (human) species by leading to the ruin of civilization, it contains in itself a good reason for being prohibited. Consequently, it is important that it be forbidden."

The absence of justice destroys the very moral fiber of society; hence, it must be noted that justice and moral values are interdependent and linked, for the presence of the latter rectifies the former, and the presence of the former is the means of preserving the latter. Ibn Khaldun continues to write, in al-Muqaddimah, that society is preserved by a set "group feeling"--an emotional connection with the whole which solidifies and unites society, insuring its preservation. He consequently states, "if the group feeling is strong, the [dynasty's] temper likewise is strong and its life of long duration." Group feeling is wholly dependent upon the identification of society with core values, respectful behavior and righteous conduct. The gradual appearance of luxury in society slowly seeps into the hearts of men, who henceforth forget the need for righteous conduct and become entrapped in the shackles of worldly desires. The Muslim scholar Ibn `Ashir wrote of this in his work al-Murshid al-Mu`in when he said, "Know that the root of all ills is the love of this material world." Indeed, the ills caused by the love of the material world not only harm the human soul but human society and civilization as well.

The function of righteous good conduct was thoroughly expounded upon in the ancient books of wisdom in the East. The Indian Sage Kathuliya wrote in his The Art of Wealth, "One should follow what is right at all times, what is wholesome and true leads to felicity," as well as saying, "Public conduct is headed by education; where there is no education, one should follow the ways of the learned. There is no education more important than conduct." In commentary on the latter aphorism, Dr. Thomas Cleary wrote:

"When moral education is clearly at variance with the conduct of leaders of society, the body public subjected to contradictory impacts may become cynical, disillusioned and disaffected, losing respect for both leadership and education. The Taoist Huainan Masters said, 'When people are influenced by their rulers, they follow what the rulers do, not what they say.'

The importance of good righteous character is paramount in causing the flourishing of any society. The Prophet Muhammad said, "The most excellent of all excellences is the excellence of character!" The driving force behind the greatness of excellence of character is the principle of loving for another that which one loves for himself. This basic principle of the impetus to expend benefit to humanity acts as a shield for society from the ills of injustice, moral decay, and societal corruption. Societal harmony can only truly be achieved through righteous character.

Confucius, the great Chinese sage, developed an astute doctrine concerning societal roles which function in guarding the harmony and foundations of society. He called these the five great relationships:

Kindness in the father and obedient devotion in the son, gentility in the eldest brother and humility and respect in the younger, righteous behavior in the husband and obedience in the wife, humane consideration in elders and deference in juniors and benevolence in rulers and loyalty of ministers and subjects.

Although society has changed radically since the time of the great Confucius, there is much wisdom that still resonates through his words. The family is the base unit of society and hence directly interlinked with the direction and situation society faces throughout time. Respect and obedience must be acted upon in their proper places to insure the longevity and harmony of society itself.

The preservation of moral values, righteous behavior, and justice in society does not entail a reactionist intolerance blind to innovation and invention but rather the adherence to the core principles of ethical conduct in one's character and behavior. Indeed, righteousness and justice repel the corruptions and ills which eerily creep into and slowly kill societies. Corruption and social ills must not be combated with other corruptions and social ills. Quite simply, evil must be repelled with that which is good; the Qur'an emphasizes this point strongly when it says, "And not alike are the good and the evil. Repel (evil) with what is best, when lo! he between whom and you was enmity would be as if he were a warm friend."

May God make us all from those who repel evil with good and stand for justice in our everyday lives.


Omar is Whim's resident homeboy.

Post a New Comment
Name: Email:
Subject of your post:
Your Comment:
No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

Omar this is probably one of the best articles Whim has run. Your article can be agreed upon by conservatives, liberals, Jews, Christians, Muslims and even "Eastern thinkers" as you have made clear. What you say is definetly true and hopefully we can realize this to keep U.S. society good.
No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

So, when do we implement the "religious police", who will go out killing homosexuals and beating women who expose "too much skin"?

"righteous behavior in the husband and obedience in the wife"

Who the fuck do you think you're kidding????

No Subject
Posted by Peter

Is it possible next semester we can get through a week without having Omar, Brian S, Brian E. and Blake shoving religion down our throat?
No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

I thought this was about values and justice--not about necessarily shoving religion down people's throat. Sure, he quoted religious people, but that doesn't really matter. Understand the point of the article before you simply critize. I mean, I keep waiting for a week when ignorant people stop posting as well, unfortunately, in Radford, that is getting harder and harder to find.
No Subject
Posted by Ray

Sure, he quoted religious people, but that doesn't really matter

I can quote religious people, too. But they are Imams and they preach death to America and Israel. Are we done yet with people pretending Islam is peaceful, or do I have to keep this up for another week?

No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

"The decadence of justice is cause for the absence of peace, harmony, and human rights within society itself. Pope John Paul II is quite often quoted as saying "if you want peace, then work for justice.""

I'm pretty sure that when the Pope said that, he didn't mean "make women obey by beating them into submission" or "convert people to your religion by cutting off their heads." YMMV.

No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

This isn't even about Islam, Ray. If you notice WHO he quotes, there are a bunch of different people, from many different realms--Western, Indian, Middle Eastern and Chinese. Get over your Islamo-phobia for one week and try to really get at what OMAR is saying.
No Subject
Posted by Ray

I (kinda) apologize for that comment. I hadn't read the article yet when I posted. It was karaoke night at Macados, and country night at JD's, and ahppy hour at Rileys. It was a long night. Sorry about that.
No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

Yeah, I'd try reading the articles. But, hey, we know you're one for generalizations.
No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

Peter, what is wrong with religion? If you don't like it, then don't read it. I bet you didn't even read Omar's article. You just scrolled down and wrote a rant.
No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

Sounds like someone ripped off the Bible: "Know that the root of all ills is the love of this material world." Sounds alfuwly similar to "the root of all evil is the love of money"
No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

Sounds like someone ripped off the Bible: "Know that the root of all ills is the love of this material world." Sounds alfuwly similar to "the root of all evil is the love of money" How about both of them agree? When similarities of the faiths are shown "someone ripped off the Bible" and when differences are shown "why don't you agree with the Bible"
No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

Like you can't find things in the Bible that *could* be rip-offs of previous stories and traditions from other religions.
No Subject
Posted by American Patriot

Laws--fair and just laws, upon which a free people have agreed--are vastly preferable to "moral values" as a foundation for a just, fair, and free society. It's pretty simple, really. The wisdom of the patriots (Madison, Jefferson, Mason) has trumped the wisdom of the prophets (any of them!) as the basis of a good government and good society, at least in my book.
No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

"and just laws" - American Patriot. "The decadence of justice is cause for the absence of peace, harmony, and human rights within society itself. Pope John Paul II is quite often quoted as saying "if you want peace, then work for justice." The great Muslim scholar Ibn Khaldun, who is considered by many to be the father of sociology, wrote of the origins of societal decay in his monumental work al-Muqaddimah, stating quite clearly: 'Injustice ruins civilization.'" - Omar.
No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

"The great Muslim scholar Ibn Khaldun, who is considered by many to be the father of sociology, wrote of the origins of societal decay in his monumental work al-Muqaddimah, stating quite clearly: 'Injustice ruins civilization.'" - Omar."

So why are you unwilling to explicitly state what kind of "societal decay" you're opposing? Stop trying to hide the reality of your agenda.

No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

If injustice ruins civilization as you claim, whose version of justice do you propose we follow? The Koran's that says it's OK to kill gays? Or people who don't agree with you? It seems to me that most third world countries lie in the Middle East and Africa-- a.k.a. Muslim countries. See a relation there? Obviously, by your definition, Islam is NOT the way to go.
No Subject
Posted by American Patriot

This is a very well intentioned article but it's basically just babble. Yes, justice is good for society, injustice is bad. Obviously. Ditto moral values, respectful behavior, and righteous conduct. But throughout history, all of the prophets, sages,and popes who have preached these qualities have never succeeded in doing much more than improving the character of INDIVIDUALS, not whole societies. And to what purpose--for the most part--have they done it? So that the individual will be obedient to a higher power--either on earth or in heaven. (Your quotes, full of references to dynasty, rulers, obedience, subjects, followers, etc. all bear this out.) Has there ever been a society founded upon any of these principles that is not inherently hierarchical? A hierarchical society does not, by definition, offer equal status to ALL members of the society.

Interestingly enough--or ironically, if you see it that way--the United States of America, founded not upon the pillars of any religion or anybody's idea of a higher moral order, but upon plain, simple laws based upon the consent of the governed, still seems to offer the best opportunity for people to live together in a just society.

No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

What in this article - goes against "fair laws" - I think that Omar was meaning on a more general scale.
No Subject
Posted by Josho

No Subject
Posted by Josho

*cough* http://jesuswouldbeashamedofyou.com/ Just a reminder to the people trying to defame Islam. All religions, political parties, and groups have their extremists. Excellent article, Omar. I love how you incorporated ideals from all parts of the globe.
No Subject
Posted by Mo

this a very well written article, Omar. i just do not know why such monkey-ass-faces like Ray keep poping up and simply try to piss you off. good luck with'em man.
No Subject
Posted by Ray

Hi Mo, I apologized already for my drunken comment made previously. Other than that I have remained silent on here. Shows how tolerant and understanding you are.
No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

You've called Arabs towelheads, ragheads, etc. You've called Muslims evil, terrorists, violent, and said that they secretly sympathize with terror. Thats a monkey ass face to me.
No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

Omar this article is phenomenal.
No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

"A monkey ass face"??? What are you, in elementary school or something? Debate the issues Monkey Butt Breath!
No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

Whats wrong with being in elementary school? Do you think your better than them? Your such a racist person. Monkey ass face man.
No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

yayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy monkeys with asses
Come On, Omar, answer the frigging question:
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

Why are you unwilling to explicitly state what kind of "societal decay" you're opposing? Stop trying to hide the reality of your agenda.
No Subject
Posted by Omar

I have a hidden agenda because I wrote an article on societal decay for an online college magazine? My intentions are written out in the article: I am opposing "injustice" quite literally with no need to superimpose figurative explanations onto that term. I am encouraging "respectful behavior" meaning being respectful and acting with dignity to others. I am encouraging loving for your brother what you love for yourself as well as "good character." The only thing which is vague is my support of "moral values" which are general only because as the great Sociological thinkers have said - social cohesion depends on a common and shared set of core moral values and this is why the word is vague because it is simply to prove the point that when these values rot away social cohesion rots away causing the social decay of society. The other three concepts are quite literal so please do not read too much into them. If you believe that I am trying to impose some sort of "hidden agenda" by using a online college magazine to spread my views then you are mistaken. Thanks, Omar.
No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

Omar, why are you on this early?
No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

I (kinda) apologize for that comment. <-- kinda... yeah your funny.
No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

"social cohesion depends on a common and shared set of core moral values and this is why the word is vague because it is simply to prove the point that when these values rot away social cohesion rots away causing the social decay of society."

So, since homosexuals generally don't have some of the same "core moral values" (for example, homosexuals don't view homosexuality as being wrong, while a great number of others in society do think it's wrong), they contribute to the "rotting away of social cohesion"?

You don't think that it's odd that the Diversity Coordinator would postulate that deviation from societal norms causes "social decay"?

Hey, here's some "Islamic Justice" for you...
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/4967108.stm
Here is some Christian justice for you
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

We have our own loony Western tradition too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquisition
No Subject
Posted by Ray

Some interesting comparisons dealing with the inquisition:

That ended in 1834. Killings in the name of Islam still occur today. We as Christians had something called reformation where you look at yourself and say "we may have fucked up here, so let's fix it." Have Muslims done that? No, they hold onto their stoneaged rituals and practices and continue to rape, torture, terrorize, and kill in the name of a faux religion.

In one year nowadays, Muslims kill more people than all 400 years of the Inquisition. Sounds a little one sided, doesnt it? I point you to The Religion of Peace for a partial list of the astrocities they have committed

I knew it was only a matter of time before someone brought up the Inquisition. The Vatican formally apologized for the actions of a minortiy of Christians. Have the religious heads of Islam said sorry about so many of our followers being hatemongorers who preach death to the West and Israel? No. Quite the contrary, they are the ones spewing hate speech against us. Do you think when they finally make it to our shores and start slaughtering us they will care that you dont like Christianity? I doubt it. They'll slit your throat just like these people:

Berg
>Armstrong
Johnson
Korean hostages.

No Subject
Posted by Some Anonymous Whim Reader

"Here is some Christian justice for you"

Ah...Than you for your highly relevant addition to a discussion on CURRENT-FUCKING-EVENTS.

It dissapoints me that RU admits idiots such as you...

Inside Whim
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Visit Our Sponsors