![]() | GEOG 235. Biogeography |
I. Compare the mammalian families that comprise each of the six Zoogeographic Provinces.
| 1: | 2: | 3: |
| rank | Characteristics | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | 1. | 2. | 3. |
| #1 (most) | |||
| #2 | |||
| #3 | |||
| #4 | |||
| #5 | |||
| #6 (least) | |||
How did you handle the number of endemic families? Did you think in terms of the absolute number of endemic familes (the raw data) or the percentage of the total families that are endemic (manuipulated data)? Are the rankings the same for each measure? Which do you think might be a more important measure of the biogeographic nature of the regions? Why?
II. Based on your rankings in part I-B., formulate three "Zoogeographic Rules" that relate taxonomic patterns to the physical geography of the provinces themselves.
Hint: model the (sentence) structure of your rules on the ecogeographic rules of Bergmann, Allen and Golger.