For a long time now, we have been seeing a lot of hype surrounding
Microsoft's new operating system (OS), Windows 2000. When it first
started, it was supposed to be a merger between Windows 9x and Windows NT.
Then, that changed some time last year, and Windows 2000 became just the
replacement for Windows NT. Well, Microsoft's latest OS has just been
released, and hundreds of customers are flowing to the stores only to be
told that it is not the right operating system for them. There are just
too many people who think that this OS is the replacement for the Windows
9x kernel.
Windows 2000, for all practical purposes, is Windows NT 5 and should be
treated as such. However, this new OS should interest people who are
advanced users and want the convenience of Windows 98 and the robust power
of NT. The new OS adds lots of new features to NT that make it of interest
to these people. One of these new features that Windows 98 users will
recognize is the support for USB (Universal Serial Bus), which makes it a
lot easier to plug in devices to the program. Another advantage this new
OS has is several of Windows 98's system features, like "device manager"
and others that make it easier to troubleshoot hardware. A feature that I
personally have been wanting is control panel and printer menus that
expand. Instead of having to go into another window, you may now go
through a menu that will show you the contents of the control panel
extension. It also includes Direct X 7.0, which allows it to play some of
the games out on the market today (that includes Quake 3).
Though it has all of these features, some of which were found in Windows
98, it still is not an operating system for the masses. One of the reasons
why it is not is the fact that it supports more devices than NT but does
not support nearly as many as Windows 98 supports. That is why you do need
to go through a thorough examination of your computer before you upgrade.
Another reason is that it does not like some of the programs that were made
for Windows 98. This is mainly the fault of the program's programmers, who
took advantage of Windows 98's tendency to let you get by with stuff that
you shouldn't do in programming.
I do recommend Windows 2000 for anybody who is a user of NT. There is no
reason why you should not upgrade. Also, for the power or advanced user,
the best combination is to have a dual boot system for Windows 98 and 2000,
which is relatively easy to set up and offers the greatest flexibility.
Windows 2000 is a great operating system. The only problem I have with it
is the lack of driver support that the operating system shipped with. There
are a lot of companies that have their Windows 2000 drivers still in beta.
If you are looking for the replacement to the consumer-level Windows 98,
2000 is not it. Look for Windows Millennium, which should come out at the
end of this year. Windows 2000 is the replacement for NT 4, and it looks
like it lives up to most of the good hype that has been floating around
about it.