Play!
 
Scream 3: A Review
Shaun Richardson | Copy Editor

Graphic By: Jenn Peterson Last weekend, Scream 3, the supposed final installment in the Scream franchise, slashed its way onto the silver screen, proving itself a chunk of box-office gold despite studio worries of inappropriate timing.

The film provides yet another look into the life of Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell), who cannot seem to avoid running afoul of serial killers wearing costumes inspired by the art of Edvard Munch. The movie also sees the return of several other Scream veterans, including Dewey Riley (David Arquette), Gale Weathers (Courtney Cox-Arquette) and Cotton Weary (Liev Schriber), who all must once again face the menace of Mr. Ghostface while trying to establish lives for themselves in Hollywood.

Relying more upon humor than its two predecessors, the latest offering in the "thrillogy" keeps the mind of the viewer alternating from periods of suspense and terror to periods of laughter. This laughter is greatly due to the standout performances of two actresses new to the series, Jenny McCarthy and Parker Posey, who play the roles of Sarah Darling and Jennifer Jolie, respectively. These two women, both portraying actresses on the movie within a movie Stab 3, deliver over-the-top performances that make their characters quite lovable (a quality necessary in order for any potential victim of a movie serial killer to win the audience's support and concern). The dynamic between Gale Weathers and Jennifer Jolie, who plays Gale in the Stab movies, is another source of laughs in the film, as the two turn the movie into one big "cat fight."

Generating concern from the audience is something that many of the film's characters fail to do, marking the only significant failing of the film. The rest of the characters borrowed from Stab 3 provide the viewer with little reason to hope that they will survive Ghostface's onslaught. Indeed, some, such as Sidney's Stab 3 counterpart (Emily Mortimer), are so annoying and hollow, that the viewer almost hopes for quick relief from their presences.

Proving that there's life after the '80s, Patrick Dempsey shows up in the role of Detective Mark Kincaid, an investigator in the murders on the Stab set who cannot help but play the hero to Sidney's damsel in distress. Cameo appearances also make positive contributions to the film. Indie favorite Heather Matarazzo (Welcome to the Dollhouse) drops in as the sister of the Sidney's late friend Randy, and Carrie Fisher momentarily loans herself to the camera to play a Carrie Fisher look-alike named Virginia Grey, who laments on how close she was to getting the part of Princess Leia in another famous trilogy.

Despite the success of the previous Scream films he penned, scribe Kevin Williamson opted not to reprise his role as screenplay writer in the trilogy's final chapter, relinquishing the duty to Ehren Kruger (Arlington Road). This personnel change does not diminish the film's quality, though, a fact probably attributable to the return of Horror Master Wes Craven to the director's chair. Craven provides excellent direction that forces the viewer to examine every possible avenue when trying to solve the mystery of the murderer's identity.

Overall, Scream 3 does its job. It delivers plenty of suspense and thrills while still managing to be entertaining and wildly amusing. Will this be the last Scream film? Let's just remember this: there was once a Friday the 13th film subtitled "The Final Chapter." That was Friday the 13th Part 4.


Responses:
Refresh frame to view latest entries.


Name: jeff
Comments:
Dear "lame article" commentator: Where exactly do you get the idea that this article sucks? This is a strikingly professional movie review and it weighs all the aspects of the film together. Would you rather Shaun wrote "This movie was crap" or "I liked the movie. It was good. Thank You"? I admit that the article is not the most amazing thing ever written, but there really is no ground for you to attack it.

Name: shaun
Year: SR
Major: psyc/reln
Comments:
To the previous commentator, it's one thing to offer criticism, but one only shows his/her own ignorance when they make a general statement like "your article is lame." If you can do a better job, have at it. That's assuming you have time to when you aren't listening to your NKOTB records.

Comments:
your article is lame...and by the way, so are you NKOTB are the bomb diggetty

Name: jeff, experienced writer
Comments:
The Horror genre DEAD? HA! That DEAD genre makes Stephen King the best-selling novelist of all time. Literary agencies (liaisons between writers and publishers) that are devoted solely to horror are abundant. New horror movies are in the works as we speak. "Halloween H20" was actually critically acclaimed, and tons of people went to see it. Why do these movies keep making sequels? Because they are cult hits, in a way, kind of like Star Wars. Sales of those masks are still sky-high. People still go to see these movies, no matter how bad they look or how good they look. In effect, the horror genre is ANYTHING but dead. It is more alive than it has ever been.

Comments:
When are they going to stop with these movies? Don't they know the horror genre is dead?

[an error occurred while processing this directive]